General sports


Dumber Than You Think PDF Print E-mail
Friday, 06 June 2008 17:00

I’m sure the majority of people out there tune in to your favorite sports radio shows or NFL draft specials on TV and just assume that the countless number of experts actually know what they’re talking about. Well guess what, they probably don’t. In fact I’d wager to say that your group of friends who sit around and talk about football all day know just as much and probably more than some of the so-called experts. Let’s face it, qualifications to becoming a writer or sports anchor do not tend to include projects such as 40-time analysis, or figuring out how many 2nd and 3rd round picks the 16th pick in the draft is worth. Apparently graduating from Syracuse University with a Masters in communications qualifies many people as automatic sports experts, when in reality all these people have to do is recite what the insiders, such as Mel Kiper and Chris Mortenson, tell us.

It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to figure out what the top 10 picks are going to be. Not when every analyst takes Mel Kiper’s mock draft and switches around two or three picks to make it look like they put some thought into it. I’m pretty sure even my cat could put together a respectable mock draft if I put 10 names on the ground, let her run around and mix them up, and then wrote down the names in the order that they appeared. But I guess maybe I’m the one who is missing the point. Afterall, I suppose that the sports media has become no better than the news media. Maybe they are just this organization whose main objective it to generate revenue through entertainment. I mean, who needs factual analysis when you can create a circus with a few controversial stories that drive the fans crazy?

Case and point, Matt Leinhart. The thing that gets me the most about his case is all of the people who I keep listening to who say that “if he only came out last year he would have been the #1 pick in the draft.” Hmmm, that’s funny, seems to me that when the season ended this year he was planning on going #2 behind teammate Reggie Bush. But guess what? We live in a society where we need 4 months to talk about the NFL draft, and that would just be too boring if the top players stayed on top where they belong. Instead you have people in the front offices of the NFL who would rather draft people on 40-times and vertical jumps than their performance on the field over the last 3 or 4 years. I don’t know about you, but I am dumbfounded how a player can rise to the #1 or #2 pick in the draft after playing quarterback for 3 years on a #1 ranked team, and suddenly after he hasn’t played for 5 months he nearly falls out of the top 10? So maybe we should hold off with the whole “Matt Leinhart would have been picked #1 last year and now has fallen to the tenth,” because for all I know he would have fallen in the draft last year as well. Let’s not forget about his off-season elbow surgery. The worst thing you can do is give an unintelligent owner more time to think unintelligently. At least Bills fans can take solace, because it’s hard for their owner to think at all when he is barely able to stay awake for more than an hour at a time. Of course it would be nice if he knew what day it was once in a while.

The bottom line is that the true experts are the people with insider access to team officials, and even those guys get used as pawns by each team in the NFL. Seemingly everyone else just uses the same “expert analysis” to come to their conclusions. Which is why I respect people like Merril Hodge who actually break down hundreds upon hundreds of hours of film, and aren’t afraid to go out on a limb and give their true analysis, even if it differs vastly from the other analysts. Maybe Jay Cutler was the only quarterback worthy of being picked on the first day. The truth is that would never happen because the NFL is no better than any other league when is comes to drafting its players based on potential, and not necessarily on what the player has shown themselves as capable of producing in the past. Is it too much to ask for a football analyst to break down who the best players actually are, and not always have to worry about predicting what the draft results will be? Personally I don’t know why they bother televising the actual draft when the time comes anyway, because by then all of the suspense has essentially been removed. Why does the commissioner need to read off that the #4 pick is D’Brickashaw Ferguson? Chris Berman just got finished telling me that 2 minutes ago.

The truth is that more than anything, the popularity of the NFL signifies just how un-interested Americans are with the rest of the sports that are currently going on. Let’s not forget that the NBA and NHL are both in their playoff seasons as we speak, and that baseball is a month old. So were these last four months really about Americans and their thirst for the game of football? Or was it about their disinterest for the other sports, mixed with a love for the absurd? Let’s not forget that professional wrestling once had a huge fan base too, and even today still has a pretty large following. Afterall, women aren’t the only gender who enjoys a good soap opera once in a while.

Want to read more? Check out www.sportslizard.com

I"m Dick Richards, and I write a column for one of the great up and coming sports collectible sites on the web, Sportslizard.com. While I have written about more serious topics in the past, i.e. sports memorabilia and its authentication processes, I enjoy sharing my thoughts on lighter topics which center around the world of sports. Whether its ripping the commisioner or baseball, criticizing a member of the media, or adding levity to the steroid situation, I thoroughly enjoy expressing myself on the issues of sports. Im also very lucky to be associated with Sportslizard.com, which has a lot to offer to sports fans of all ages and interest levels, whether it be the autograph collector, sports figure enthusiast, and your average 20-something sports junkie. I look forward to writing more and more articles for sportslizard for many years to come.

 
The Top 5 Sports News Web Sites PDF Print E-mail
Wednesday, 28 May 2008 12:00

There are literally thousands of places on the web to get your sports news information. Whether you want the latest headlines, up to the second scores, editorials, or in depth analysis, there are a myriad of choices for you. While some sites only offer one or two of those things, there are several that offer all of those and more. My Top 5 are below:

5. Yahoo! Sports (sports.yahoo.com) - this site is all substance and no flash. It looks essentially the same as it did five years ago. That"s not necessarily a bad thing, it just doesn"t knock your socks off. Any information that you need is readily available and up to date. Columnists aren"t as well known as the top sites, but they are solid.

4. FOX Sports (msn.foxsports.com) - a few years ago this site was a mess. It was the anti-Yahoo! - all flash and no substance. In the past few years they"ve toned down the flash and increased the substance. The live gamecasts at the top of the page are extremely innovative. For example, for a baseball game you not only see the score, but also an overview of the diamond and what runners are on base. If you are interested in a specific game you can roll your mouse over it and get more details. If FOX keeps innovating like that, they won"t be number 4 for long.

3. Sports Illustrated (sportsillustrated.cnn.com) - this site excels in two things - editorials and rumors. They have THE best writers (they are Sports Illustrated after all) and they do an excellent job of providing tons of content. Peter King"s Monday Morning Quarterback column is absolutely priceless. They also compile a "Truth and Rumors" section for each of the major sports. It"s essentially a compilation of all of the rumors from local newspapers across the country. The best part about it is it"s free, unlike ESPN"s rumors.

2. CBS SportsLine (cbs.sportsline.com) - everything is great about SportsLine - they are often the first to break news, gamecasts are innovative and effective, and for what it"s worth the fantasy sports are the best on the web. Well, they are great at everything except editorials and analysis, and they are horrible at that. Tony Mejia, Dennis Dodd, Pete Prisco, and Greg Doyle are the worst group of sports writers on the web. Where are the editorials from their on-air personalities like Jim Nantz and Billy Packer? ESPN and FOX manage to get their on-air personalities to write, maybe CBS should consider it. Read the comments at the bottom of any article by any of the aforementioned writers and you"ll realize that I"m not the only one that thinks they are horrible.

1. ESPN (www.espn.com) - they are consistently ahead of the curve in every one of the important aspects. They are the worldwide leader in sports and they show no signs of giving up that crown on the web. I commend them for getting their best personalities - John Clayton, Steven A. Smith, Barry Melrose, and Peter Gammons - to write consistently good articles. The only downside is that too much information is hidden in the "Insider", ESPN"s paid service. It"s frustrating to read a headline, click, and then realize that you can"t read the story because you have to pay for it.

Adam McFarland - EzineArticles Expert Author

Disagree? Rate and review sports web sites at Scorecard.SportsLizard.com.

Adam McFarland owns the SportsLizard.com Network - a network of sports sites including collectibles, movies, books, video games, and more.

SportsLizard.com recently won honorable mention in the Microsoft Start Something Amazing Awards and was featured in the February 2006 issue of Tuff Stuff Magazine.

 
Bicycles - Transport At Its Best PDF Print E-mail
Thursday, 22 May 2008 09:01

Imagine walking everywhere in this day and age. I hear you laugh with a degree of decision. Do we walk enough? Medics perhaps would not think so. We rely so heavily on transport in so many varied ways nowadays, walking is no longer a practical option. We tend only to use walking as a form of exercise nowadays rather than a necessary form of transport.

Turn your minds back then to as relatively a short time ago as, say, 1830. Transport was carriages, drawn by horses and the horse and cart. So we relied almost entirely on our own two legs. Distances were not even considered as a hindrance, we simply got off our backsides and walked!

Then along came the bicycle. Let"s think about this for a moment. From having pretty well no means of personal transport at all, within a reasonably short time, this mode of transport became a saviour for getting from A to B.

OK, firstly we have the penny-farthing and all its "relatives" that we now see in sepia-coloured documentaries, but it wasn"t such a long time before they became commonplace in most places in the so-called civilised world.

Time was cut down by half and more on these labour-intensive trips. How in heavens name could you plan successfully a trip that might need an overnight stay? Now, not only could bicycles be considered a reliable mode of transport, they could also be used for family pleasure and good old-fashioned days out altogether.

We have now looked how this vehicle revolutionised transport, but is it as popular now as it was then, or has the motor vehicle taken over? Of course the car is more popular because it is even more convenient, but that does not mean that the bicycle has been shoved into the background, never to be heard of again.

Think of the various types of bicycle that is used in sport. We have the streamlined racing machines we see in the velodrome, types of bicycles that reach incredible speeds in road races like the Tour de France and finally mountain bikes, those sturdy vehicles that pound rocks and hard or wet ground and still come through at the end.

All these are human drive, pedal-powered and pushed to their technological limits. No quick spin around the park for these fellows. The price of these bikes, which I won"t go into here, would make your hair curl with fright.

Pedal-power nowadays is still the preferred form of transport. Take a country like Holland. Flat as a tack. Without question, it makes sense for its population to take advantage of the geography of their country and ride their bikes with minimal strain on their physical condition.

I read only the other day that there are eight million bicycles in the Republic of China. Pollution would certainly be improved with this amount of two-wheeled vehicles.

I think it is fair to say that the bicycle is here to stay. It would surprise me in the least to hear of other new activities for this most popular form of transport.

Long live the bicycle!!

Michael Russell - EzineArticles Expert Author

Michael Russell Your Independent guide to Bicycles

 
«StartPrev12345678910NextEnd»

Page 1 of 11